3 ms·
The way I interpret GP is not that they want more crimes to be committed, but rather that McKinsey people are already committing plenty of crimes, but only one
by chihuahua 3y ago
The way I interpret GP is not that they want more crimes to be committed, but rather that McKinsey people are already committing plenty of crimes, but only one of them went to prison so far.
- jncfhnb 3y agoNice nuanced opinion I guess.
- grotted 3y agoSays the McKinsey employee.
- jncfhnb 3y ago… yeah. Not too keen on someone saying me and my peers should go to prison without having committed a crime tbh.
- _jal 3y agoThe argument is that there are plenty of unprosecuted crimes already, obviously. I understand why you might disagree with that, and I understand why your reading comprehension might work better when not discussing your employer, but I have to say, you're really not helping your firm's reputation here.
- jncfhnb 3y agoThat’s not really the argument though. Because the person in question was prosecuted for something unrelated. It’s just a blanket request for people who work there to go to jail. It also (probably unintentionally) calls out entry level workers specifically.
- tecleandor 3y agoWell I don't know about your business in McKinsey, but just in case you don't know about your company's criminal record (bad if you do, bad if you don't), you could a quick review of the "Controversies" section for McKinsey in Wikipedia, including colaboration with authoritarian regimes, corruption in south Africa, arms business with Russia, jail consulting... When was the last opioids crisis settlement, a month and a half ago? How much is it already? Almost a billion dollars. Nuanced, yep.