4 ms·
Not really, no. The whole reason the fiasco occurred in the first place is because it's in a league of its own. Bard and Claude are likely to be suggested, but
by SeanAnderson 3y ago
Not really, no. The whole reason the fiasco occurred in the first place is because it's in a league of its own.
Bard and Claude are likely to be suggested, but the competency gap is palpable. I've tried using them and failed to find them sufficiently compelling to adopt into my workflow for programming tasks.
- deadmutex 3y agoThat's a bit of a generalization from one task though, no? E.g. bard is hooked into the Google services like Maps and YouTube, so if you want to plan a trip or search contents of a video, it is likely better.
- SeanAnderson 3y agoYeah, it is, I agree. I don't have a workflow where I bounce between LLMs trying to get the best results. I use LLMs when I think I'll get results faster than if I just Google for the answers. After a few letdowns with the competition I stopped defaulting to thinking about how they could help me. Do you use a variety of LLMs in your daily life? Can you share some queries you'd issue to Bard for Maps/YouTube integrations that ChatGPT fails at? I'd be very interested in some concrete examples. Specifically in a post-plugin world where ChatGPT uses Bing to interface with the web. I don't want to become blind to the advancements in competitor's tooling.
- dasmascusstuui 3y ago[dead]