4 ms·
> As a reader, would you ever prefer to be given the AI-fluffed version instead of the outline? Why read Huckleberry Finn when you can read the cliffs notes?
by ParetoOptimal 3y ago
> As a reader, would you ever prefer to be given the AI-fluffed version instead of the outline?
Why read Huckleberry Finn when you can read the cliffs notes?
Summarization is lossy, usually on the experiencing part.
- explaininjs 3y agoSee second paragraph.
- Feathercrown 3y agoBut having AI extend your notes includes all the loss of the initial summarization, with extra AI randomness on top. It can't recover the information lost in the summary, that's what makes the summary lossy.
- esafak 3y agoIt can, in the way you can follow the abstract of a paper with its body. Don't forget that the model has access to the original text; it's not just going off the summary.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- freilanzer 3y ago> Why read Huckleberry Finn when you can read the cliffs notes? The difference should be self-evident.