4 ms·
Page 33 of 58: "146. For example, in June 2023, Apple’s Apple Developer agreements prevented cryptocurrency wallet apps Zeus and Damus from providing decentrali
by lapcat 3y ago
Page 33 of 58: "146. For example, in June 2023, Apple’s Apple Developer agreements prevented cryptocurrency wallet apps Zeus and Damus from providing decentralized payments on iOS and iPadOS devices"
- Someone 3y agoThat doesn’t say they deactivated a developer account. It also can mean, and I think that’s the normal way to interpret such a statement, that they rejected their app. I also don’t see an argument there that being cited in an anti trust case is a factor there. This claim may well be true, and it may be hard to prove, but they should at least try, and this doesn’t do that for me.
- lapcat 3y ago> That doesn’t say they deactivated a developer account. You seem to be a bit confused. The lawsuit wasn't about deactivating the developer account. The link just shows that Zeus was cited in someone else's anti-trust lawsuit. You complained about "58 pages of legalese", so I pointed out the exact page number where Zeus was cited. The deactivation of the developer account occurred after the lawsuit. If you're not convinced about the reason for the account deactivation, that's fine, but the "58 pages of legalese" complaint is kind of irrelevant.