Lots of people here really seem to be grasping at straws to side with the board on this one. But there really just isn't any case to be made. The board hasn't

Lots of people here really seem to be grasping at straws to side with the board on this one. But there really just isn't any case to be made. The board hasn't even bothered to explain to anyone, apparently even the interim CEO, exactly why they fired Sam Altman. I see all this speculation that they did it out of principles and concerns over safety, but if so, why haven't they said that? Is there any actual evidence that this is the case? And when 95% of people are against you, it's most likely that you are just wrong, not that everyone else is greedy and corrupt.