4 ms·
Or, when you fire people, have a clear reason for it. Not being "consistently candid" is not that.
by tempaccount420 3y ago
Or, when you fire people, have a clear reason for it. Not being "consistently candid" is not that.
- whatshisface 3y agoYou want companies to post the reasons for every firing on Twitter?
- YetAnotherNick 3y agoNo, but at least tell the reasons to the CEO you replaced him with. Even Shear was kept in dark and was planning to leave OpenAI.
- mock-possum 3y agoI’m ambivalent about it in general, but curious in this case specifically.
- dghlsakjg 3y agoNo. But if you are going to make a statement, it behooves you to fill it with substance.
- whatshisface 3y agoThat's not how board press release are. I can't help but feel everyone is using Twitter rules to study a corporate game.
- quickthrower2 3y agoNot regular employees. Twitter is one method of communication.
- satisfaction 3y agolying of any type is always grounds for termination. "consistently candid" is just a more PC phrase for lying.
- Buttons840 3y agoCandid means speaking your mind; truth. "Consistently candid" therefore means consistently telling the truth, perhaps even to a fault.
- mort96 3y agoThe details matter here. Consistently lying is grounds for termination. Not consistently being outspoken/blunt might not be. "Not being consistently candid" can be interpreted as either.