4 ms·

The Future Is Flutter

8 points by worik 3y ago

worik 3y ago
I really, deeply, disagree Interested what others think
- jononomo 3y ago
  I’m about to go all in on a Flutter. I need a cross platform mobile/web framework that doesn’t use JavaScript, and I’ve heard that Flutter is a joy to work with.
  - Vt71fcAqt7 3y ago
    I highly encourage you to do so, but only if web isn't your main focus.
    - worik 3y ago
      Strongly agree about web Use Javascript this year, Rust to WASM next year Mobile phone apps should have had their day. Build webapps in HTML5
- jononomo 3y ago
  Why do you disagree?
  - account-5 3y ago
    I'd be interested too. As far as I'm aware nothing currently available can do what dart/flutter can.
    - worik 3y ago
      HTML5
      - account-5 3y ago
        On its own no. You need a browser.
  - worik 3y ago
    Dart is very good at doing pointless things. The optimiser is terrific at optimizing things after you need them (there is a longer story there) I spent a bit of time using it in web context, clunky and buggy. The test harness is constrained in all sorts of arbitrary ways. I say arbitrary, I expect there is a strong theory behind it, and google insists.... As for flutter itself the easy things are easier, the hard things much harder. I did not build our ui but I could never find where anything is executed in it A flutter UI is not (?) HTML On the web there exists HTML5 which inherits the oddities of CSS and facilitates any old shit you want fromm Javascript, but it is very tractable. Easy things still easy, hard things easier. Dart/flutter was meant to replace Javascript, I can see how they started, but they got lost. Got to say, the developers were very responsive on their issues page
    - account-5 3y ago
      Dart was the replacement for JavaScript, flutter came later and kind of saved dart. I quite like flutter though on the web agree it's not the best.
jauntywundrkind 3y ago
The lower-level wasm-based model (namely, Towards a Modern Web Stack) does give devs absolute power. Every company has full power to have their code do whatever they want on a computer. . And what a sick abominable horrible thing that would be for the world. Industrial absolutism definitely has some enticement & draws; you the dev/company have total power & control! But heavens it sounds like an infernal wicked thing to do, to replace consensus of protocols and standards with each company deciding for themselves how each computer works. Letting every corporation do low level engineering of their own app platform removes the possibility of inter-working different systems. It is that we have a shared medium that user agency rides atop, that what understandability we have springs from. This is a wildly radical zero-sum pro-corporate wholesale replacement of the interoperable internet with corporate crafted special sauce. It makes the only malleable soft thing in the tech world about us unobservable & indecipherable. I dream of more than the internet as a delivery platform for closed inaccessible unintelligible illegible foreign systems. Instead of having protocols and standards and media, instead of having a user agent and extensions: what the user experiences would all be dynamic code, it's own engine. It's all a live running self defining universe. No app will have any similarity or prarallel to any other, nor expose hooks; the interface becomes non-distinct, a perfect opaque barrier to the user. Each app brings it's own universe with it, that's what low-level means, and I don't know how user agency or internetworking survive that descent to lower shadowier realms. It is wild that the long long time HTML editor has decided that RFC8890 The Internet Is For End Users can be shot into the sun, that has decided standards and protocols and specifications aren't worth doing and that industrial supremacy is above all, is the only thing that matters. There's a long history of the Hixie et Al's Towards a Modern Web Stack being submitted, https://hn.algolia.com/?query=towards%20a%20modern%20web%20stack&sort=byDate https://hn.algolia.com/?query=towards%20a%20modern%20web%20s... . Not a huge update here, just a commitment that Hixie is still on this quest after leaving Google.
- account-5 3y ago
  Are we not a good way there with the various frameworks that download the application to the clients and read massive JSON objects to dynamically create what the user sees? I'm not disagreeing with you but think we're already mostly there and wasm is the next step.
fyokdrigd 3y ago
he's retiring to work on the same project he was before. what's next, pay to volunteer?

8 points by worik 3y ago

worik 3y ago

I really, deeply, disagree Interested what others think

jononomo 3y ago
I’m about to go all in on a Flutter. I need a cross platform mobile/web framework that doesn’t use JavaScript, and I’ve heard that Flutter is a joy to work with.
- Vt71fcAqt7 3y ago
  I highly encourage you to do so, but only if web isn't your main focus.
  - worik 3y ago
    Strongly agree about web Use Javascript this year, Rust to WASM next year Mobile phone apps should have had their day. Build webapps in HTML5
jononomo 3y ago
Why do you disagree?
- account-5 3y ago
  I'd be interested too. As far as I'm aware nothing currently available can do what dart/flutter can.
  - worik 3y ago
    HTML5
    - account-5 3y ago
      On its own no. You need a browser.
- worik 3y ago
  Dart is very good at doing pointless things. The optimiser is terrific at optimizing things after you need them (there is a longer story there) I spent a bit of time using it in web context, clunky and buggy. The test harness is constrained in all sorts of arbitrary ways. I say arbitrary, I expect there is a strong theory behind it, and google insists.... As for flutter itself the easy things are easier, the hard things much harder. I did not build our ui but I could never find where anything is executed in it A flutter UI is not (?) HTML On the web there exists HTML5 which inherits the oddities of CSS and facilitates any old shit you want fromm Javascript, but it is very tractable. Easy things still easy, hard things easier. Dart/flutter was meant to replace Javascript, I can see how they started, but they got lost. Got to say, the developers were very responsive on their issues page
  - account-5 3y ago
    Dart was the replacement for JavaScript, flutter came later and kind of saved dart. I quite like flutter though on the web agree it's not the best.

jauntywundrkind 3y ago

The lower-level wasm-based model (namely, Towards a Modern Web Stack) does give devs absolute power. Every company has full power to have their code do whatever they want on a computer. . And what a sick abominable horrible thing that would be for the world. Industrial absolutism definitely has some enticement & draws; you the dev/company have total power & control! But heavens it sounds like an infernal wicked thing to do, to replace consensus of protocols and standards with each company deciding for themselves how each computer works. Letting every corporation do low level engineering of their own app platform removes the possibility of inter-working different systems. It is that we have a shared medium that user agency rides atop, that what understandability we have springs from. This is a wildly radical zero-sum pro-corporate wholesale replacement of the interoperable internet with corporate crafted special sauce. It makes the only malleable soft thing in the tech world about us unobservable & indecipherable. I dream of more than the internet as a delivery platform for closed inaccessible unintelligible illegible foreign systems. Instead of having protocols and standards and media, instead of having a user agent and extensions: what the user experiences would all be dynamic code, it's own engine. It's all a live running self defining universe. No app will have any similarity or prarallel to any other, nor expose hooks; the interface becomes non-distinct, a perfect opaque barrier to the user. Each app brings it's own universe with it, that's what low-level means, and I don't know how user agency or internetworking survive that descent to lower shadowier realms. It is wild that the long long time HTML editor has decided that RFC8890 The Internet Is For End Users can be shot into the sun, that has decided standards and protocols and specifications aren't worth doing and that industrial supremacy is above all, is the only thing that matters. There's a long history of the Hixie et Al's Towards a Modern Web Stack being submitted, https://hn.algolia.com/?query=towards%20a%20modern%20web%20stack&sort=byDate https://hn.algolia.com/?query=towards%20a%20modern%20web%20s... . Not a huge update here, just a commitment that Hixie is still on this quest after leaving Google.

account-5 3y ago
Are we not a good way there with the various frameworks that download the application to the clients and read massive JSON objects to dynamically create what the user sees? I'm not disagreeing with you but think we're already mostly there and wasm is the next step.

fyokdrigd 3y ago

he's retiring to work on the same project he was before. what's next, pay to volunteer?