> the need for regulation is already there. We need regulation that holds people accountable. I see too many 1%ers claiming they were not responsible for somet

> the need for regulation is already there. We need regulation that holds people accountable. I see too many 1%ers claiming they were not responsible for something their algorithm did. In old sci-fi, a computer was the legal agent of its operator/owner and anything that computer did was 100% the fault of its owner/operator. If we simply say "you are responsible for what your AI does," then the problem is solved. We could solve the problem if not being able to bring corporations to justice at the same time. Forxe them to beck e proprietorships. Every owner/partner is culpable for crimes committed by that proprietorship. Did a cop arrest an obviously innocent person? It's the cop's fault. Did my web site plagiarize a painting? Then it's my fault. Did a startup release venerable software? Then the crook that exploited the bug is responsible but so it the entity that released the software. If we get back to common sense and stop blaming the Twinkie for the murder, things get a lot simpler. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twinkie_defense https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twinkie_defense