This is why all these organisations which are promoting non-free licenses as "open source" when they mean source available is completely silly. Either they are

This is why all these organisations which are promoting non-free licenses as "open source" when they mean source available is completely silly. Either they are BSD/GPL and accept competition or they do not, and they are not open source. The only update that I agree with is the AGPL because of the nature that software is being closed back up and not shared for studying purposes.