3 ms·
I find that very unlikely. LLMs seem capable of simulating human intuition, but not great at simulating real complex physics. Human intuition of how a scene “sh
by bbor 3y ago
I find that very unlikely. LLMs seem capable of simulating human intuition, but not great at simulating real complex physics. Human intuition of how a scene “should” look isn’t always the effect you want to create, and is rarely accurate im guessing
- dragonwriter 3y ago> LLMs seem capable of simulating human intuition, but not great at simulating real complex physics. Diffusion models aren't LLMs (they may use something similar as their text encoder layer) and they simulate their training corpus, which usually isn't selected solely for physical fidelity, because that's not actually the single criteria for visual imagery outside of what is created by diffusion models.
- bbor 3y agoHuh fair enough. I mean they are large models based on language but I see your point. Even though everything you said is true, I still believe there’s a place for human-constructed logically-explicit simulations and functions. In general, and in visual arts.