6 ms·
It’s not quite the same thing though, is it? This is a person with a history of provocations making an indirect threat. I’m not saying he deserves punishment,
by ra7 3y ago
It’s not quite the same thing though, is it?
This is a person with a history of provocations making an indirect threat. I’m not saying he deserves punishment, but I can see why the Indian government would take his threat very seriously.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> a person with a history of provocations making an indirect threat It’s sort of like an Iranian student group saying American Airlines isn’t safe to fly anymore. Like, okay? Not nice. But not quite a threat. (Certainly not a credible one.)
- natureGood14 3y agoThe issue is that this statement of Panun will be used against innocent Sikhs and will cause undue burden on them, in the worst case leading to human rights violations. India has no qualms with using draconian laws like UAPA, NSA, and sedition and ruin the livelihoods of people and their families.