3 ms·
OK, you've pasted from the #1 Google result after searching for "46.875 kHz samplerate". What does this have to do with the Teenage Engineering EP-133? It does
by driggs 3y ago
OK, you've pasted from the #1 Google result after searching for "46.875 kHz samplerate".
What does this have to do with the Teenage Engineering EP-133? It doesn't have USB audio or SPDIF, so no standard samplerate clock to conflict with.
- MrBuddyCasino 3y agoIt does have DACs, that presumably operate at the standard frequencies.
- driggs 3y agoThe ADC and DAC operate at 46.875 kHz, its samplerate. That's the entire point of my original comment about it being nonstandard.
- CamperBob2 3y agoThe thing is, if the sample rate matters with respect to anything other than the Nyquist limit, your filtering isn't good enough. Relying on spacing between sample clock harmonics to keep beatnotes out of the passband isn't great engineering practice. I have to do that in a relatively-exotic RF application, admittedly, but I wouldn't advertise it as a feature. :) And I'd never choose that approach at audio frequencies. There's just no need.
- driggs 3y agoThe concern isn't about the trivial difference in Nyquist frequency, it's about aliasing and dithering when importing/exporting/synchronizing digitally. 1 sample from the EP-133 is 1.0629251700680271 samples at 44.1kHz, or 0.9765625 samples at 48kHz. (But, again, it doesn't export/synchronize audio digitally, so it probably only matters if directly importing samples.)