> Given that the percentages of blocked spam are just 17, 50, 67 & 83, it appears that the sample was likely just 6 spam emails which isn't a lot. This is ment

> Given that the percentages of blocked spam are just 17, 50, 67 & 83, it appears that the sample was likely just 6 spam emails which isn't a lot. This is mentioned, but a little hidden (in the description for URL encoding): > This is based on a small sample size: just six bots that were observed over a one-year period. I think the number of spam emails would be a bad measure, since a single scan could result in many hundreds of spam emails.