3 ms·
Is anyone using open source models to actually get work done or solving problems in their software architecture? So far I haven't found anything near the qualit
by cloudking 3y ago
Is anyone using open source models to actually get work done or solving problems in their software architecture? So far I haven't found anything near the quality of GPT-4.
- voiceblue 3y agoWizardCoder is probably close to state of the art for open models as of right now. https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/tree/main/WizardCoder https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/tree/main/WizardCoder https://huggingface.co/WizardLM/WizardCoder-Python-34B-V1.0 https://huggingface.co/WizardLM/WizardCoder-Python-34B-V1.0 Top of the line consumer machines can run this at a good clip, though most machines will need to use a quantized model (ExLlamaV2 is quite fast). I found a model for that as well, though I haven't used it myself: https://huggingface.co/oobabooga/CodeBooga-34B-v0.1-EXL2-4.250b https://huggingface.co/oobabooga/CodeBooga-34B-v0.1-EXL2-4.2...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- gsuuon 3y agoZephyr is coherent enough to bounce ideas off of, but I'm eagerly awaiting when open-source models are on par productivity wise with the big providers. I imagine some folks are utilizing codellama 34b somehow, but I haven't been able to effectively.
- xcv123 3y ago> So far I haven't found anything near the quality of GPT-4 GPT-4 has an estimated 1.8 trillion parameters. Orders of magnitude beyond open source models and ~10x GPT-3.5 which has 175 billion parameters. https://the-decoder.com/gpt-4-architecture-datasets-costs-and-more-leaked/ https://the-decoder.com/gpt-4-architecture-datasets-costs-an...
- ramoz 3y agoThe reality is there is no general use case for open source models, such as there is gpt-4. The decent chat ones are based on gpt data and they’re basically shitty distilled models. The best use case is a narrow one that you decide and can create adequate fine-tuning data around. Plenty of real production ability here.