> Why would one person owning something so important be better than being publicly owned? Usually publicly owned things end up being controlled by someone: a C

> Why would one person owning something so important be better than being publicly owned? Usually publicly owned things end up being controlled by someone: a CEO, a main investor, a crooked board, a government, a shady governmental organization. At least with Elon owning X, things are a little more transparent, he’s rather candid where he stands. Now, the question is “who owns Musk?” of course.