Wasn't really following the subject, but amazed at how tendentious the writing here is. Starting with the title, unsubstantiated claims, really weird turns of p

Wasn't really following the subject, but amazed at how tendentious the writing here is. Starting with the title, unsubstantiated claims, really weird turns of phrase, etc. Here's an example: > not just common, it’s start-up gospel from Altman’s longtime mentor, venture capitalist Peter Thiel — according to whom? Is it supposed to be common knowledge? Is this even a helpful parallel? In comparison, reporting on FT on this same topic is a lot more subdued and matter-of-fact.