3 ms·
> First I understand that if a user disable JavaScript then it has a functioning fallback That isn't the only case. They could be on an unreliable internet con
by naasking 3y ago
> First I understand that if a user disable JavaScript then it has a functioning fallback
That isn't the only case. They could be on an unreliable internet connection and the JS fails to load. They could be referencing unpkg and it's down or otherwise unreachable. There could have been a syntax or other error that escaped testing that causes the JS to fail to execute. The point is that there are many failure modes that may cause the JS-only approach to fail to display anything at all, where the progressively enhanced version is still usable.