5 ms·
It's definitely a lot of work to have all pokemon. They all need stats. They all need a habitat. They all need a moveset evolution. And if you fuck up even one
by rowanG077 3y ago
It's definitely a lot of work to have all pokemon. They all need stats. They all need a habitat. They all need a moveset evolution. And if you fuck up even one a ton of fans that really like that pokemon are upset. It's disappointing but I really understand why they don't do all pokemon.
- TheCapeGreek 3y ago>They all need stats >They all need a moveset evolution Neither of these have to shift a substantial amount between generations. The current stats & moves structure solidified by gen 4 already. >They all need a habitat No they don't. Trade them in and out of Home/Bank/whatever to move across generations, trade with other players, etc. This was standard flow up until the latest few generations. There is not much extra game design consideration needed until you're talking about new features. But a good percentage of mons are still in the new games, so is it really that much extra effort to balance when you have new features in play? It can be as simple as just not giving older mons the same new abilities. Not every one got mega evolutions, for example. Gamefreak are just lazy. Employee reviews seem to confirm this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFWjhfhJJqE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFWjhfhJJqE