4 ms·
No, because many writers have editors whose role is to prevent mistakes like these from going to print
by garblegarble 3y ago
No, because many writers have editors whose role is to prevent mistakes like these from going to print
- hef19898 3y agoSo, if bad grammar -> human. If good grammar -> could be both?
- briansbum 3y agoMentioned elsewhere, bad grammar could be a human telling an AI to be plausibly bad.
- garblegarble 3y agoI don't think there's any sure way to tell, and trying to do so in the past has massively disadvantaged people who have English as a second language & get accused of plagiarism via LLM (can't find source with a quick google, but there was an ESL student accused of plagiarism by an 'ai text detection' model). I think we just have to embrace the fact that any text could be wholly/partially LLM generated. An LLM could be asked to introduce errors (or a human could edit the output, either to purposefully introduce errors, or naturally introduce errors as part of their process). We should focus on: 1. Developing our skills to verify people's claims (which has always been important) 2. Trying to understand the motivations/agenda behind the text (which I reckon is even more important still) The above two steps insulate you from a wide range of propaganda/trickery, and are the sorts of things we should have been focusing on in schools for decades already.