> If you have built an unsafe AI, you delete the code and burn down the building But it doesn't need to get to that end point - if the board thought that the d

> If you have built an unsafe AI, you delete the code and burn down the building But it doesn't need to get to that end point - if the board thought that the decisions the CEO had made or likely to make in the future would not lead to the core goal of "building AGI that is safe and benefits all of humanity" - because, for example, future work would be dominated by links to Microsoft, or he would be distracted by building other for profit companies that built on OpenAI work, they they would also be right to sack him even if it meant destroying the profitability/growth of the company. I think the structure of OpenAI was a hideous idea - but I can't help but feel the board may have acted according to the rules they'd been given.