3 ms·
Fully agree, AND it's just bad business decision by them. At this point, what they want is Meteor being used by as many developers as possible. That's a big rea
by zavulon 15y ago
Fully agree, AND it's just bad business decision by them. At this point, what they want is Meteor being used by as many developers as possible. That's a big reason Rails, Node.js, etc got so successful. Instead, they cut off their own feet before learning how to walk.
Unless they change their licensing terms, when Yahoo's Mojito framework finally comes out (or some other competitor who is just as good as Meteor) under MIT license, Meteor will go the way of ExtJS, Powerbuilder, HD-DVD and Betamax.
- bjxrn 15y agoMojito was released two weeks ago: http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2012/04/yahoo%E2%80%99s-mojito-is-now-open-source/ http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2012/04/yahoo%E2%... On github: https://github.com/yahoo/mojito/ https://github.com/yahoo/mojito/ Edit: It's released under a BSD license.
- zavulon 15y agoOoops.. I can't believe I missed it. Thanks!