4 ms·
Assuming they weren’t LARPing, that Reddit account claiming to have been in the room when this was all going down must be nervous. They wrote all kinds of nasty
by transcriptase 3y ago
Assuming they weren’t LARPing, that Reddit account claiming to have been in the room when this was all going down must be nervous. They wrote all kinds of nasty things about Sam, and I’m assuming the signatures on the “bring him back” letter would narrow down potential suspects considerably.
Edit: For those who may have missed it in previous threads, see https://old.reddit.com/user/Anxious_Bandicoot126 https://old.reddit.com/user/Anxious_Bandicoot126
- fordsmith 3y agoLink? Not sure which account you are referring to
- transcriptase 3y agohttps://old.reddit.com/user/Anxious_Bandicoot126 https://old.reddit.com/user/Anxious_Bandicoot126
- crakenzak 3y agoContext?
- mvdtnz 3y agoFirst of all nothing on Reddit is real (within margin of error). Secondly it's weird that you'd assume we know what you're talking about.
- transcriptase 3y agoLinks to the profile/comments were posted a few times in each of the major OpenAI HN submissions over the last 4 days. On the off-chance I would be breaking some kind of brigading/doxxing rule I didn't initially link it myself.
- ShamelessC 3y ago> must be nervous I seriously doubt they care. They got away with it. No one should have believed them in the first place. I’m guessing they don’t have their real identity visible on their profile anywhere.
- epups 3y agoWhy can't these safety advocates just say what they are afraid of? As it currently stands, the only "danger" in ChatGPT is that you can manipulate it into writing something violent or inappropriate. So what? Is this some San Francisco sensibilities here, where reading about fictional violence is equated to violence? The more people raise safety concerns in the abstract, the more I ignore it.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> Why can't these safety advocates just say what they are afraid of? They have. At length. E.g., https://ai100.stanford.edu/gathering-strength-gathering-storms-one-hundred-year-study-artificial-intelligence-ai100-2021-1-0 https://ai100.stanford.edu/gathering-strength-gathering-stor... https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.03718.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.03718.pdf https://eber.uek.krakow.pl/index.php/eber/article/view/2113 https://eber.uek.krakow.pl/index.php/eber/article/view/2113 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10242589221147228 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/102425892211472... https://jc.gatspress.com/pdf/existential_risk_and_powerseeking_ai.pdf https://jc.gatspress.com/pdf/existential_risk_and_powerseeki... For just a handful of examples from the vast literature published in this area.
- epups 3y agoI'm familiar with the potential risks of an out-of-control AGI. Can you summarise in one paragraph which of these risks concern you, or the safety advocates, in regards to a product like ChatGPT?
- FartyMcFarter 3y agoIt's not only about ChatGPT. OpenAI will probably make other things in the future.
- astrange 3y agoThey invented a whole theory of how if we had something called "AGI" it would kill everyone, and now they think LLMs can kill everyone because they're calling it "AGI", even though it doesn't work anything like their theory assumed. This isn't about political correctness. It's far less reasonable than that.
- blackoil 3y agoI read the comments, most of them are superficial as if someone with no inside knowledge will post. His understanding of humans is also weak. Book deals and speeches as a motivator is hilarious.
- shrimpx 3y agoThat doesn't sound credible or revealing. It's regurgitating a bunch of speculation stuff that's been said on this forum and in the media.
- ssnistfajen 3y agoIt was definitely LARP. The vast majority of anecdotes shared on Reddit originate as some form of creatice fiction writing exercise.