“A warrant requirement would amount to a de facto ban, because query applications either would not meet the legal standard to win court approval; or because, wh

“A warrant requirement would amount to a de facto ban, because query applications either would not meet the legal standard to win court approval; or because, when the standard could be met, it would be so only after the expenditure of scarce resources, the submission and review of a lengthy legal filing, and the passage of significant time — which, in the world of rapidly evolving threats, the government often does not have,” The serious issue for IT professionals is, as always, to find a solution that meets all needs: Efficiency (resource consumption), privacy, legality. I don't know enough of the requirements, but a couple possibilities: * Automate warrant submissions (obviously). * Provide warrantless views of the data that preserve privacy and allow rapid review. For example, hide all proper nouns and only allow a GPT and intelligence agent to review it. If something is found, it can be passed to law enforcement for warrant requests. Again, I really don't know nearly enough about the requirements, process, etc., but it would be interesting to hear from someone who does.