5 ms·
that is the type of error humans make frequently but LLMs make rarely
by dkarras 3y ago
that is the type of error humans make frequently but LLMs make rarely
- hef19898 3y agoSo, the fair assumption would be to assume all content with too good to be true writing and grammar is AI written?
- garblegarble 3y agoNo, because many writers have editors whose role is to prevent mistakes like these from going to print
- hef19898 3y agoSo, if bad grammar -> human. If good grammar -> could be both?
- briansbum 3y agoMentioned elsewhere, bad grammar could be a human telling an AI to be plausibly bad.
- garblegarble 3y agoI don't think there's any sure way to tell, and trying to do so in the past has massively disadvantaged people who have English as a second language & get accused of plagiarism via LLM (can't find source with a quick google, but there was an ESL student accused of plagiarism by an 'ai text detection' model). I think we just have to embrace the fact that any text could be wholly/partially LLM generated. An LLM could be asked to introduce errors (or a human could edit the output, either to purposefully introduce errors, or naturally introduce errors as part of their process). We should focus on: 1. Developing our skills to verify people's claims (which has always been important) 2. Trying to understand the motivations/agenda behind the text (which I reckon is even more important still) The above two steps insulate you from a wide range of propaganda/trickery, and are the sorts of things we should have been focusing on in schools for decades already.
- guenthert 3y agoPerhaps not yet, but surely a generation from now.