3 ms·
It's unlikely that model weights are even copyrightable in the first place, at least based on what the US Copyright Office has said in the past. In fact, it see
by cosmojg 3y ago
It's unlikely that model weights are even copyrightable in the first place, at least based on what the US Copyright Office has said in the past. In fact, it seems that even the outputs of such models are excluded from copyright protection, regardless of the skill involved in their production[1]. IANAL, but it's likely that the license documents attached to these large language models amount to little more than somewhat weak ToS agreements, allowing the distributor a bit more leeway in managing their legal/commercial relationship with users of said models.
At the end of the day, though, this is all mere speculation. We won't know the truth until someone decides to burn the cash necessary to test it in court.
[1] https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/klpygnkyrpg/AI%20COPYRIGHT%20decision.pdf https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/klpygnkyrpg/...
- whimsicalism 3y ago> even the outputs of such models are excluded from copyright protection, regardless of the skill involved in their production Not “even” - the case for model outputs not being copyrightable is much more straight forward than the weights.
- snickerbockers 3y agoIt's going to be really ironic when the same people who think copyright law doesn't apply to their deep-learning models get all pissy over people violating their IP.