4 ms·
It does not sound like what she did helps advance the development of AGI that is broadly beneficial. It simply helps slow down the most advanced current effort,
by pama 3y ago
It does not sound like what she did helps advance the development of AGI that is broadly beneficial. It simply helps slow down the most advanced current effort, and potentially let a different effort take the lead.
- winenbug 3y ago> It simply helps slow down the most advanced current effort If she believes that the most advanced current effort is heading in the wrong direction, then slowing it down is helpful. "Most advanced" isn't the same as "safest". > and potentially let a different effort take the lead Sure but her job isn't to worry about other efforts, it's to worry about whether OpenAI (the non-profit) is developing AGI that is safe (and not whether OpenAI LLC, the for-profit company, makes any money).