No, it's step one. There are two more steps to take. One more is taken: the conceal step. Now the question, do the others know whether the crypto is from a cont

No, it's step one. There are two more steps to take. One more is taken: the conceal step. Now the question, do the others know whether the crypto is from a contract killing. To quote the article: > Chris and the other participants suspect the possibility that dirty money is entering the jar, but they don't do due diligence, then they could be found guilty of money laundering. Say, Chris finds themselves in front of judge and jury for money laundering. An expert for the prosecutor might be able to convince the jury the ratio of criminals among crypto mixers users are so high they should have done due diligence. Which, of course, you can't do if the mixer works properly. This convincing will be immensely helped by the OFAC putting mixer addresses on the SDN list. Thus, the only way to make sure you stay on the straight and narrow is to not use crypto mixers.