4 ms·
A chat is a chat is a chat. There is a setting in the app under data controls where you tell it not to use your charts for training.
by gtirloni 3y ago
A chat is a chat is a chat. There is a setting in the app under data controls where you tell it not to use your charts for training.
- xyst 3y agoThe illusion of control. We check all of these boxes yet our data still continues to get sold
- gtirloni 3y agoI don't disagree but I'm just stating what is available in the app. Voice or text, they treat chats as a single thing. I understand the downvotes for showing disapproval at OpenAI's policies (or big tech's), but I don't know what else could I say. Should I have just replied with a snarky comment saying "a-ha! you expect them to respect your privacy? pffff"
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- I_am_tiberius 3y agoThe setting is only saved client side which is a very odd design decision. I guess they made it that way so that if you disable the flag at one point (yes, it's active by default), the change only effects future requests. This whole privacy situation with openai makes me really angry with Sam Altman, who seems not to care about that at all - this setting seems to be specifically designed to be privacy-disrespecting. It reminds me on the early days of facebook when they set all your profile information to be public, but openai is much worse, because the information you put into the prompt is likely much more sensitive.
- 4ggr0 3y agoWhat bothers me about HN currently is that the majority seems to not be bothered by it, stating that OpenAI tries to be ethical, that Sam can be trusted etc. Has everyone forgotten about Google? Facebook? Every other SV Tech-Startup? Why would OpenAI be different? "They're a non-profit". Yeah, sure. As if Wall Street, M$ et al would just not try to monopolize and commercialize AI as soon as possible.