3 ms·
> because the composition of the court isn't going to change. At least not during my lifetime, and probably not yours. Why not? The age of the justices in orde
by chrononaut 3y ago
> because the composition of the court isn't going to change. At least not during my lifetime, and probably not yours.
Why not? The age of the justices in order from oldest to youngest is 75, 73, 69, 68, 63, 58, 56, 53, 51.
Even if you're 60 or older you have a pretty good chance of seeing the composition change.
- jfengel 3y agoOf the four court members under 60, three are conservative. Of the remaining five members, it takes only two conservatives to ensure that the court remains that way. Assuming that future nominations are equally distributed, there's about a 2/3 chance that at least two will be conservative. And let's just say that I don't think it will be randomly distributed. The existing court composition has a thumb on the scale of future nominees. The party that nominates conservative judges has won only one election outright this century, but until recently only one opposing candidate had been able to win -- including once because the Supreme Court directly stepped in. It's harder to calculate just what that means, but I think it's sufficient to affirm that the odds are very long against being able to generally reverse this court's direction before Halley's Comet returns.