> Your position is not internally consistent I'm throwing out suggestions as to why various differing parties here may be doing what they're doing. There's no

> Your position is not internally consistent I'm throwing out suggestions as to why various differing parties here may be doing what they're doing. There's no need for internal consistency because it's not a unified top-down scenario, it's multipolar game theorizing. 'If A does B, then why would C do D, that isn't consistent' well the answer is that A and C are competing, not cooperating.