4 ms·
> have nothing to loose if OpenAI dies Not according to Sam Altman: "Development of superhuman machine intelligence is probably the greatest threat to the cont
by reducesuffering 3y ago
> have nothing to loose if OpenAI dies
Not according to Sam Altman: "Development of superhuman machine intelligence is probably the greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity."
https://blog.samaltman.com/machine-intelligence-part-1 https://blog.samaltman.com/machine-intelligence-part-1
- YetAnotherNick 3y agoI said nothing to loose, not nothing to gain.
- reducesuffering 3y agoThe word is "lose." You're still not making sense, as the point is they have their lives to lose, possibly.
- YetAnotherNick 3y agoJesus, get your brain checked. Just to reiterate I said nothing to lose if OpenAI is killed. In your argument they are losing if it is not killed, a polar opposite.
- reducesuffering 3y agoThat is hilarious coming from you who can't possibly wrap your head around the meaning. There is a scenario where if OpenAI is killed, it leads to the existential risk that Sam Altman and the board believe can happen. So "if OpenAI is killed," the board does not have "nothing to lose." It is deeply ironic how much this forum complains about EA / lesswrong and yet I see hundreds of practically illiterate uninformed takes here a week. Practically all the tech CEO / VP types joke about it. This place likes to think of itself as high brow but it's closer to Reddit than academic circles.
- jay_kyburz 3y agoOff topic, but I watched The Creator last night and it was super dumb and really did not even attempt imagine what a war against AI might look like. There was really no explanation for why the AI were walking around dressed as people or why they would want to limit themselves to such a degree. I think Terminator did it much better.