3 ms·

> Or just… not hire all of them. Much easier. Then a competitor might hire all of them. If you're in the AI business you don't want that. You want to grab eith

> Or just… not hire all of them. Much easier. Then a competitor might hire all of them. If you're in the AI business you don't want that. You want to grab either all of them or balkanize them. Come on, this isn't a hard concept to grasp. > And in the scenario where they actually think they're mad ... the script of a Marvel film Then you hire them on a 5 year exclusive contract so they can't rejoin Hydra. > It makes you look like the mad one It's normal human writing style, hyperbole, sarcasm, exaggeration, wit, irony, you know. Adult writing, for adults to consume.

ben_w 3y ago
You're saying > Sure, it's in their interest to break up a unified bloc of talent And > If you're in the AI business you don't want that. You want to grab either all of them or balkanize them. And > Nobody wants to invest in a personality cult that's sworn an oath of fealty to one guy, dude. That's basically flushing money down the toilet, as this fiasco demonstrates. These lunatics are ready to sacrifice their children on twitter. You cannot work with people like that! These are mutually incompatible positions.
- 15457345234 3y ago
  Oh, I see what you mean. When I said 'grab all of them' I meant the researchers. On the assumption that you can deprogram them, lol.
jacquesm 3y ago
Your position is not internally consistent, you should really think over what each of those implies and then drop or adjust one or more of these.
- 15457345234 3y ago
  > Your position is not internally consistent I'm throwing out suggestions as to why various differing parties here may be doing what they're doing. There's no need for internal consistency because it's not a unified top-down scenario, it's multipolar game theorizing. 'If A does B, then why would C do D, that isn't consistent' well the answer is that A and C are competing, not cooperating.

ben_w 3y ago

You're saying > Sure, it's in their interest to break up a unified bloc of talent And > If you're in the AI business you don't want that. You want to grab either all of them or balkanize them. And > Nobody wants to invest in a personality cult that's sworn an oath of fealty to one guy, dude. That's basically flushing money down the toilet, as this fiasco demonstrates. These lunatics are ready to sacrifice their children on twitter. You cannot work with people like that! These are mutually incompatible positions.

15457345234 3y ago
Oh, I see what you mean. When I said 'grab all of them' I meant the researchers. On the assumption that you can deprogram them, lol.

jacquesm 3y ago

Your position is not internally consistent, you should really think over what each of those implies and then drop or adjust one or more of these.

15457345234 3y ago
> Your position is not internally consistent I'm throwing out suggestions as to why various differing parties here may be doing what they're doing. There's no need for internal consistency because it's not a unified top-down scenario, it's multipolar game theorizing. 'If A does B, then why would C do D, that isn't consistent' well the answer is that A and C are competing, not cooperating.