4 ms·

Source? Ben didn't read his cited source in his article yesterday.

• gjsman-1000 3y ago
  Currently, the claim is unproven. However, if I were an investor, I'd be pounding on the doors demanding for clarification.
  • himaraya 3y ago
    I meant, can you link the claim that the clause in question got removed?
    • gjsman-1000 3y ago
      https://stratechery.com/2023/openais-misalignment-and-microsofts-gain/ https://stratechery.com/2023/openais-misalignment-and-micros... "Microsoft’s original agreement with OpenAI also barred Microsoft from pursuing AGI based on OpenAI tech on its own; my understanding is that this clause was removed in the most recent agreement." (It's hidden under a citation bubble you need to click after the third paragraph.)
      • himaraya 3y ago
        I see. Pursuing AGI sounds distinct from commercializing future versions of ChatGPT based on OpenAI IP. I imagine the exact legal wording in the contract makes all the difference. The WSJ article from June he cited indicates the license still comes with restrictions. https://www.wsj.com/articles/microsoft-and-openai-forge-awkward-partnership-as-techs-new-power-couple-3092de51 https://www.wsj.com/articles/microsoft-and-openai-forge-awkw...
  • jacquesm 3y ago
    I'd have my lawyers do the pounding.