4 ms·
> the company deliberately kept its stake at 49%, likely to sidestep antitrust concerns. And yet a “Person of Significant Control” in UK corps would need only
by supermatt 3y ago
> the company deliberately kept its stake at 49%, likely to sidestep antitrust concerns.
And yet a “Person of Significant Control” in UK corps would need only a 25% share (or voting rights), OR be deemed to have “significant influence”.
Why are competition laws so backwards :(