4 ms·
I would argue that holding someone to a standard, ethical or otherwise, requires some sort of accountability. And yet, in the US, we have congressmen/women who
by atmavatar 3y ago
I would argue that holding someone to a standard, ethical or otherwise, requires some sort of accountability.
And yet, in the US, we have congressmen/women who regularly engage in insider trading and accept bribes in the form of lobbying and cushy jobs after they leave office, we have multiple sitting Supreme Court justices accepting bribes, and we have a former president who isn't even held to the same standard we hold our children.
I'd be hard-pressed to come up with any examples of a high-status individual being held to a higher standard than the rest of us. Sure, there's a lot of belly-aching on social media from time to time, but in most (all?) cases, it's for falling short of a standard we're all expected to satisfy, and there's almost never any real consequences.
- kortilla 3y ago> we have multiple sitting Supreme Court justices accepting bribes When you use the word “bribe” to describe something that isn’t, it dilutes your point significantly. This is a thread about ethics, you can use precise words and still talk about how they are unethical.