I'll qualify myself. AI and LLMs of all forms we've seen so-far don't break any of our known laws of reality, or ideals of computing and the internet. That's wh

I'll qualify myself. AI and LLMs of all forms we've seen so-far don't break any of our known laws of reality, or ideals of computing and the internet. That's why when I hear claims like "a rogue AI will x" I have to call it 'magic'. Rogue AI's don't do anything, they are dependent on human resources and if they become enough of a threat the operator becomes a target. AI is almost inconsequential in this case, we're just describing organized crime and wondering how traditional systems would respond. So the 'magic' bit is explicitly where someone starts with "imagine a world where AI is unconstrained and runs on some arbitrary P2P network" because it doesn't make sense. It's such an evident non-issue in our real world that speculating about it is immediately pointless. If this ever becomes a threat in the future then I guess I'm the fool, but I don't believe in hand-waving wizardry.