3 ms·
I suspect you might have a different definition of ethics. I doubt many people would, for instance, murder for comfort or achieving their goals.
by amanaplanacanal 3y ago
I suspect you might have a different definition of ethics. I doubt many people would, for instance, murder for comfort or achieving their goals.
- throwawaysleep 3y agoMurder is illegal and has significant negative personal consequences. But lots of things are not illegal and thus can be done with non-social risk.
- withinboredom 3y agoMost unethical behaviors (regardless of being illegal or legal) have significant personal consequences. However, most unethical things are actually also illegal, falling under "fraud", "willful neglect", etc. There's a gray area, usually referred to as "dark patterns" that aren't yet proven to be illegal, but likely are, if the regulators ever had the free time to care. But yeah. Unethical people might find they have a hard time actually getting past a certain point in relationships (business or friendly), though sometimes it's good to have a few shrewd people in your back pocket to call on.
- NotMichaelBay 3y agoLet's hope so, otherwise it looks like someone is... sunglasses Murder for FIRE
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> doubt many people would, for instance, murder for comfort Individually, no. But we have a remarkable ability to adapt group ethical systems when resource needs demand it. The conflict arises when these adaptations occur in too-small a group, e.g. at the company level within a country, or a country level within an integrated continent.