3 ms·
Not saying that it isn't an important question but if the site doesn't work without js the user will most certainly not enable it just to decide whether the app
by tjoff 15y ago
Not saying that it isn't an important question but if the site doesn't work without js the user will most certainly not enable it just to decide whether the app/site is worth their time.
The instant the site fails the decision has been made.
If your site breaks without js you must at least realize that you will, at the very least, annoy the users who has actively disabled it.
- Drbble 15y agoPeople who look for trouble are apt to find it. Next, you would have to build a cookieless site, avoid Flash and other annoying videos, fly blind without tracking etc. /NoScript user /I am the 1 percent
- kijin 15y ago> avoid Flash and other annoying videos I can't think of a single reason why that would be a bad thing.
- chris_wot 15y agoYou say that like its a bad thing! Actually sounds pretty good to me :-) seriously, when building a trite, shouldn't that be th first thing you do, then layer that stuff on top? Sounds like it would actually be easier to test!