3 ms·
Be careful with this article, it’s based on a poster at a scientific meeting, not a peer reviewed publication.
by robg 3y ago
Be careful with this article, it’s based on a poster at a scientific meeting, not a peer reviewed publication.
- tokai 3y agoA poster at a conference stand a good chance to get more and better peer feedback than what is afforded to the peer review of the average journal paper.
- robg 3y agoPerhaps, but that feedback won’t be reflected in the poster itself, maybe the publication, if there is one.
- robwwilliams 3y agoHmm, not the case in my experience going to Society for Neuroscience for 25 years. If you are luck you get useful (non-critical) feedback from 5 people. Why would one “review” a poster seriously? They are often years away from submission even to bioRxiv. 3 cases id single-cell RNA-seq per group, all males. I hope you all appreciate the amazing noise level of single-cell RNAseq. This study should have used bulk RNAseq to keep noise lower.