First of all, it's of course the Meteor team's prerogative to chose whatever license they want, and wanting attribution and pull requests is in no way an unwort

First of all, it's of course the Meteor team's prerogative to chose whatever license they want, and wanting attribution and pull requests is in no way an unworthy cause. That said, GPL made me look twice. Mainly because client and server are so intertwined, that I assume the entire app would need to be GPL'd to use Meteor without getting a commercial license. Now I've nothing against the dual licens, and paying for a framework that makes us money , but before shopping Meteor around the company it'd be good to have some specifics on what they're thinking in terms of a commercial license model. I hope that's on their priority list. It's hard to motivate investing in something that may later turn out to be prohibitively expensive.