3 ms·
Central Line is due next ~2030. Then Bakerloo: ~2033. It's kind of reasonable to deprioritise the Bakerloo, even as someone who used to use the Bakerloo very f
by lawtalkinghuman 3y ago
Central Line is due next ~2030. Then Bakerloo: ~2033.
It's kind of reasonable to deprioritise the Bakerloo, even as someone who used to use the Bakerloo very frequently. Bakerloo gets significantly less usage than other lines: Piccadilly has double the number of annual travellers than the Bakerloo, for instance.
(It'll be interesting to see if Piccadilly usage numbers go down now Crossrail has been finished and some portion of Heathrow travellers switch over.)
The Bakerloo itself is also kind of a weird, redundant line. The NW segment doubles up with the Watford DC line, and for a lot of NW destinations like Wembley, the Jubilee and Metropolitan are better choices.
There was also the issue of the proposed extension out to New Cross and/or Lewisham. They probably wanted to put off making a decision on the rolling stock upgrade until after they'd decided whether they were doing the SE extension.
- te_chris 3y agoIn my exerpience, whatever traffic the Elisabeth line has diverted hasn't made a difference. Piccadilly line still busy - I live on it.
- gpvos 3y agoHasn't Crossrail also diverted many travellers from the Central line?
- _aaed 3y agoWarwick Avenue and Maida Vale are two important stations to the Bakerloo line in my opinion