Yes... Why would a PM put Sentry on the roadmap, unless that PM has some reasonable level of technical understanding, but at that point the same PM should have

Yes... Why would a PM put Sentry on the roadmap, unless that PM has some reasonable level of technical understanding, but at that point the same PM should have been aware of many of the security implications of the overall project. A not unreasonable guess would be that Sunbird doesn't have a great number of senior engineers on staff, either do to cost, or because very few wanted to take on such a project. So it cobbled together by inexperienced engineering that know enough to understand the Sentry is useful, but not experienced enough avoid logging credentials. Basically all the errors listed in the article just reads like what happens when you set a bunch of inexperience developers and SREs to build a platform that doesn't want to exist. Which leads me to: How the does this even work? I'd assume a massive number of virtualized macOS installation, anything more advanced would sort of negate the incompetence on the security front. Sort of a side note: I questioned the point of the Nothing Phone and Nothing Phone 2 when they where both released, they are nothing more than Android phones with a few gimmick but everyone was loosing their minds over those things and now ArsTechnica writes: "Nothing has always seemed like an Android manufacturer that was more hype than substance" (and apparently also did for back when the Nothing Phone release. I'm getting so very tied of the hype and how easily any criticism can be reject as me being old and "not getting it".