4 ms·

Hmm... 1. Ok i understand the usecase, but the website itself looks spooky..probably bcoz a,Design-- the frame surrounded by so many pics b, am just biased

by aangjie 15y ago

Hmm... 1. Ok i understand the usecase, but the website itself looks spooky..probably bcoz a,Design-- the frame surrounded by so many pics b, am just biased due to the the goth look on the front page pic.. 2.spelling mistake at step 3 receiver not reciver(i recommend using a spell-checker. bad spelling raises the spooky component)

Paul_S 15y ago
Typos aren't as bad as bad grammar. I can immediately correct typos in my mind as I read the text. I have to parse the sentence first to correct grammar. Butchering of English aside, the service can't deliver unless it's human moderated which it can't be.
- reion 15y ago
  I don't really see how the human moderation would help. You still cannot make sure if the picture that one of the parties is trying to send is actually his/her real picture.
  - Paul_S 15y ago
    Maybe also checking against a reverse image search to reject publicly available photos?
nkohari 15y ago
I'm not disagreeing with anything you're saying, but if you're going to be a grammar/spelling nazi, you could at least take the time to format your comment in a reasonable fashion.