That headline is bad, not sure if it's deliberate. The way it's phrased, it sounds like they were given two different explanations. Such as when the first expl

That headline is bad, not sure if it's deliberate. The way it's phrased, it sounds like they were given two different explanations. Such as when the first explanation is not good enough, a second weaker one is then provided. But the article itself says: > OpenAI's current independent board has offered two examples of the alleged lack of candor that led them to fire co-founder and CEO Sam Altman, sending the company into chaos. Changing the two "examples" to "explanations" grossly changes the meaning of that sentence. Two examples is the first steps of "multiple examples". And that sounds much different than "multiple explanations".