What if your lawyers say one thing, but one of your possible regulators say something else? Or rather, doesn’t say anything, just allude? It’s for the courts t

What if your lawyers say one thing, but one of your possible regulators say something else? Or rather, doesn’t say anything, just allude? It’s for the courts to decide then. That’s what they’re literally for. You could argue that a more productive approach would be to come up with something at the lawmaker level. Even if it’s so restrictive that it drives most exchanges out, such as Canada has done.