3 ms·
I agree they are playing different sports! Ideally, unrendered markdown still provides a first-class reading experience. I don't think Typst has that as a des
by anonymous_sorry 3y ago
I agree they are playing different sports!
Ideally, unrendered markdown still provides a first-class reading experience.
I don't think Typst has that as a design goal.
- kaba0 3y agoTypst texts are quite readable, the language has explicit support to make it as good as feasible (e.g. longer text parameters can be passed unquoted within a [] block, so it is still left readable). Plus you can abstract away more complex configs inside a function, and end up with `#myFunc [My normal unquoted text]` But it is apples to oranges, you can properly format text to book editor capabilities with typst, while you can only do basic stuff with markdown.