>You're inferring a lot from my comment, a lot that isn't there and wouldn't be there. You're also straw-manning rationalize your position: that you've been rig

>You're inferring a lot from my comment, a lot that isn't there and wouldn't be there. You're also straw-manning rationalize your position: that you've been right for 2+ days that Sam Altman is an evil "clout chasing" tech bro who was going to oust the board but thankfully the ethical good people got to him first First you say I'm inferring then you infer what my position is. I told you my position. I'm speculative on anything except for the board being mentally retarded. You agree with me but you proceed to say this: >My take comes from a background of not thinking boards are all that special compared to company leaders, and they're at their best when they don't interfere with extraordinary CEOs/Founders. Further, my general belief is that inexperienced boards are common, detrimental, and don't really understand this. I'm also biased against nonprofit boards, mostly from personal experience though obviously with smaller orgs. This up above is essentially YOU saying the board is mentally retarded but dressing it up in nicer clothes. Literally you don't even mention a reason here. You just say, inexperience and detrimental which is "stupid" but dressed up. >My current take on this situation is not so much that the board was mentally retarded, but that the org structure allowed people with strong competing interests and very little "skin in the game" in the org to serve on the board, creating stronger incentives for an activist board than incentives for long-term success, which (as I alluded to) leads to poor outcomes. An "activist" board? That's just another synonym for being a dumbass. When someone gets fired it's usually because of incompetence, hatred, dislike, public pressure or power. >Strong incentives here to slow down OpenAI in favor of their own external, competing missions. This is valid IF you have the evidence of the incentive. State the competing interests and Emmet Shears motive for slowing down OpenAI by 90%.