3 ms·
I wish that would work with non-tech people. In my experience, no matter how hard you try to teach them, they'll end up messing up the formatting in some way.
by stefandesu 3y ago
I wish that would work with non-tech people. In my experience, no matter how hard you try to teach them, they'll end up messing up the formatting in some way.
- mbork_pl 3y agoThis. ALmost nobody knows/uses that feature. FTR, there are also many people who use LaTeX in a similar way...
- paledot 3y agoWhich is a commentary on the UX of the feature, not on the users.
- mbork_pl 3y agoFair enough - but how would you improve the UX?
- paledot 3y agoNot a UX designer, but I would try worsening the UX of B/I/U/size operations to make users more inclined to reach for the formatting style picker instead. I would also heavily optimize the process to edit styles, so changing the font size of a heading changes all headings of that level unless you specify otherwise. (In fact, as I talk through this, I think the solution may just be to abandon the idea that attributes like bold and size are applied directly to text, and instead associate them exclusively with styles. Basically the migration from <b> to <strong> at the dawn of CSS, in WYSIWYG form.) Ultimately you'd end up with a word processor that's harder to use but easier to use right. And no sales team will greenlight that. But this entire discussion is predicated on a very prescriptivist viewpoint of the "right" way to use a word processor.
- eviks 3y agoHow hard would you try to teach them to use Typst?