3 ms·
That isn't what was said at all. The statement was that these ads don't appear next to "the content in Media Matters’ article", which might just mean that the c
by bagels 3y ago
That isn't what was said at all. The statement was that these ads don't appear next to "the content in Media Matters’ article", which might just mean that the content in the article was not that popular, or that other advertisers were displayed next to that content.
- clouddrover 3y agoIf you have to guess what it "might" mean then nothing has been said. Her claim is Media Matters "manipulated" Twitter. The reality is they just used it, found neo-nazi content, and saw ads next to that content. Why would any brand want to advertise on Twitter when that outcome is so easy to achieve?