3 ms·
Pretty good, I think! (Maintainer.) What I liked best about it is the portability, the scoping, and the preprocessor, which I prefer in particular to how many
by classichasclass 3y ago
Pretty good, I think! (Maintainer.)
What I liked best about it is the portability, the scoping, and the preprocessor, which I prefer in particular to how many other assemblers do macros, and that's why I ended up taking it over (though Andre still did a lot of the code in this release too). The linking is not something I personally use much but other people do, and the O65 binary object format it uses covers a lot of use cases.
- ngcc_hk 3y agoThanks. Given I am using ca65 (not even cc65), do you mind anything I should take into consideration for trying yours. Other than for the old time sake.